Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alexander W. VanBrocklin's avatar

This is certainly an awkward agreement. As someone who is not part of the Church of Rome, I actually whole-heartedly agree with your call toward exclusivism, even if it may condemn me. I recently was reading a post from an ex-evangelical who was “educating people on cult-like practices.” One of the common behaviors mentioned was if “Your religious group expressed certainty that their beliefs were “the truth” while all others were wrong.” It’s sad to see that this really is where we have arrived, that belief itself can be labeled #religioustrauma or #spiritualabuse (Yes, these really were the tags they chose to use.) When I was a young teenager, my mother once asked me, “you always think you’re right, don’t you?” Doesn’t everybody? Apparently, not anymore. As Christians, we need not be ashamed that we have confidence in the truth of the Gospel. Neither should we back down when people challenge us with emotionally charged questions. The path is narrow; not many will enter. This of course is where our thoughts divide. I do believe that there is salvation outside the Church of Rome (and within it, to be clear.) But I applaud your call to prayer, fasting and catechization. These are tenets that will lead the church into unity, and out of the chaos of the 21st century. Stand firm in your Roman Catholicity. Continue to convert both unbelievers and protestants alike. To do anything otherwise would devalue your faith, and diminish your message. Thank you for the delightful read! God bless!

Expand full comment
Martin Fegan's avatar

Just read your post and found a confusing few sentences that seem to contradict your preceding words. I mean the part where you say (and I paraphrase) that if non-catholics achieve salvation it will be despite their false religion not because of it. That would mean there actually can be salvation outside the Church if some non-Catholics actually do be saved despite their not being Catholic and despite the dogmatic statement you quoted which asserts the contrary. Might this caveat be a contributory factor in stifling one’s zeal somewhat and diminishing the sense of urgency we ought to have in bringing as many souls as possible to the one true Faith? Would it not be better to take that dogmatic statement as it is writen (which makes no such allowances) and not concern ourselves with speculation on matters beyond our knowledge? As for invincible ignorance, where has it ever been taught that ignorance can be salvivic? Hosea 4: 6 tells us, “My people perish for lack of knowledge.” Either one can find salvation outside the Church or one cannot. The thrice defined dogma states one cannot so who do we follow?

This may have come off somewhat over critical but despite my unsolicted critique I found it commendable. I’m very aware that human nature being what it is sees the door everso slightly ajar anf nothing will do until it’s pushed all the way open. See where this kind of speculation leads when we here a “pope” say that God wills all relgions and all of them lead to God (except maybe Teaditional Catholicism).

Expand full comment
2 more comments...